European Society Of Cardiology Guidelines Research Articles

Value of Extended Arrhythmia Screening in Adult Congenital Heart Disease Patients

The European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of adult congenital heart disease patients recommend screening for arrhythmias and bradycardias in symptomatic patients, often being done by means of an ambulatory 24–48-hour Holter or implantable loop recorder (ILR). However, nowadays non-invasive instruments, such as patches, smartwatches and smartphones based on single-lead ECGs that perform extended monitoring, are also available. The aim of this narrative review was to assess whether these instruments, when they detect arrhythmias and bradycardias in patients with adult congenital heart disease, will lead to meaningful changes in clinical care. Clinically meaningful changes include adjustment of medication, cardioversion, electrophysiology study, ablation or implantation of a cardiovascular implantable electronic device. The following monitoring instruments are discussed: cumulative Holter, 2-week continuous monitor, smartwatch- and smartphone-based single-lead ECG, and ILR. The diagnostic yield of extended rhythm monitoring is high, and varies between 18% (smartphone-based single-lead ECG) and 41% with ILR. In conclusion, contemporary arrhythmia screening includes various new non-invasive technologies that are promising new tools as an alternative to Holter monitoring or ILR. However, the optimal mode of detection is still unclear due to the lack of head-to-head comparisons.

Treatment of chronic heart failure in advanced chronic kidney disease: the HAKA multicenter retrospective real-world study.

Chronic heart failure (HF) has high rates of mortality and hospitalization in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (aCKD). However, randomized clinical trials have systematically excluded aCKD population. We have investigated current HF therapy in patients receiving clinical care in specialized aCKD units. The Heart And Kidney Audit (HAKA) was a cross-sectional and retrospective real-world study including outpatients with aCKD and HF from 29 Spanish centers. The objective was to evaluate how the treatment of HF in patients with aCKD complied with the recommendations of the European Society of Cardiology Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of HF, especially regarding the foundational drugs: renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi), angiotensin receptor blocker/neprilysin inhibitors (ARNI), beta-blockers (BB), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA), and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i). Among 5012 aCKD patients, 532 (13%) had a diagnosis of HF. Of them, 20% had reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), 13% mildly reduced EF (HFmrEF), and 67% preserved EF (HFpEF). Only 9.3% of patients with HFrEF were receiving quadruple therapy with RASi/ARNI, BB, MRA and SGLT2i, but the majority were not on the maximum recommended doses. None of the patients with HFrEF and CKD G5 received quadruple therapy. Among HFmrEF patients, approximately half and two-thirds were receiving RASi and/or BB, respectively, while less than 15% received ARNI, MRA or SGLT2i. Less than 10% of patients with HFpEF were receiving SGLT2i. Under real-world conditions, HF in aCKD patients is sub-optimally treated. Increased awareness of current guidelines and pragmatic trials specifically enrolling these patients represent unmet medical needs.

[Multidistrict atherosclerotic disease: epidemiological and clinical framework].

Atherosclerosis is a systemic disease that can involve different arterial districts. Traditionally, the focus of cardiologists has been on the diagnosis and treatment of atherosclerotic coronary artery disease (CAD). However, atherosclerosis localization in other districts is increasingly common and is associated with an increased risk of CAD and, more generally, of adverse cardiovascular events. Although the term peripheral arterial disease (PAD) commonly refers to the localization of atherosclerotic disease in the arterial districts of the lower limbs, in this document, in accordance with the European Society of Cardiology guidelines, the term PAD will be used for all the locations of atherosclerotic disease excluding coronary and aortic ones. The aim of this review is to report updated data on PAD epidemiology, with particular attention to the prevalence and its prognostic impact on patients with CAD. Furthermore, the key points for an appropriate diagnostic framework and a correct pharmacological therapeutic approach are summarized, while surgical/interventional treatment goes beyond the scope of this review.

The Evolving Field of Acute Coronary Syndrome Management: A Critical Appraisal of the 2023 European Society of Cardiology Guidelines for the Management of Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Acute coronary syndromes (ACS), encompassing conditions like ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS), represent a significant challenge in cardiovascular care due to their complex pathophysiology and substantial impact on morbidity and mortality. The 2023 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines for ACS management introduce several updates in key areas such as invasive treatment timing in NSTE-ACS, pre-treatment strategies, approaches to multivessel disease, and the use of imaging modalities including computed tomography (CT) coronary angiography, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and intracoronary imaging techniques, such as optical coherence tomography (OCT) and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). They also address a modulation of antiplatelet therapy, taking into consideration different patient risk profiles, and introduce new recommendations for low-dose colchicine. These guidelines provide important evidence-based updates in practice, reflecting an evolution in the understanding and management of ACS, yet some potentially missed opportunities for more personalized care and technology adoption are discussed.

Evaluation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) risk assessment score in incident systemic sclerosis-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension (SSc-PAH).

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) patients may be stratified as low, intermediate, or high risk of 1-year mortality. In 2022, the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) updated and simplified its risk stratification tool, based on three variables: WHO functional class (FC), serum N-terminal pro-brain type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and six-minute walk distance (6MWD)), applied at follow up visits, intended to guide therapy over time. We applied the 2022 ESC risk assessment tool at baseline and follow up (within two years) to a multinational incident cohort of systemic sclerosis-associated PAH (SSc-PAH). Kaplan-Meier curves, Cox hazards regression and accelerated failure time models were used to evaluate survival by risk score. At baseline (n = 260), the majority of SSc-PAH (72.2%) were graded as intermediate risk of death according to the 2022 tool. At follow-up, according to 2022 tool, half (55.5%) of the cohort were classified as low or intermediate-low risk. The 2022 risk model at follow up was able to different survival between risk strata. All three individual parameters (WHO FC, NT-proBNP, 6MWD) were significantly associated with mortality at baseline and/or follow up. The 2022 ESC risk assessment strategy applied at baseline and follow up predicts survival in SSc-PAH. Treatment decisions for SSc-PAH should include risk assessments, aiming to achieve low risk status according to the 2022 ESC guidelines.

Atteinte des cibles thérapeutiques recommandées en prévention secondaire après infarctus du myocarde dans un centre tertiaire nord-africain

Despite the demonstrated efficacy of cardiovascular (CV) preventive measures, data from international literature indicate that control of CV risk factors (RF) remains insufficient in very high-risk patients. This study aimed to assess prevalence of achievement of recommended therapeutic targets for the major and modifiable CVRF 12 months after myocardial infarction (MI). From 1st January to 30th April 2023, we collected consecutive patients with type 1 MI who had completed 12 months follow-up. Primary endpoint was prevalence of achievement of all recommended therapeutic targets of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), diabetes mellitus (DM), arterial hypertension (HTN), and smoking. Targets and treatment goals were defined according to the 2021 European Society of Cardiology guidelines on CV disease prevention. 107 patients, mean age 58.8 ± 8.8 years, 74.8% male, were included. 42 (39.3%) patients had HTN, 50 (46.7%) were diabetics, 77 (72.0%) were smokers and eight (7.5%) had hypercholesterolemia. At 12 months, primary endpoint was achieved in 20 (18.7%) patients. 55 (71.4%) of 77 smoker patients were weaned. Blood pressure was at target in 26 (61.9%) among hypertensive patients. In DM patients, HbA1c target was achieved in 23 (46.0%) of them. 32 patients (29.9%) achieved the goal of LDL-C < 0.55 g/L. Secondary prevention of CV disease was suboptimal. Less than a fifth of patients achieved treatment target for most major and modifiable risk factors. Improvement in follow-up care and treatment after MI is needed.

Status and Future Directions for Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Disease With and Without Pulmonary Hypertension: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Balloon pulmonary angioplasty continues to gain traction as a treatment option for patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary disease with and without pulmonary hypertension. Recent European Society of Cardiology guidelines on pulmonary hypertension now give balloon pulmonary angioplasty a Class 1 recommendation for inoperable and residual chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Not surprisingly, chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension centers are rapidly initiating balloon pulmonary angioplasty programs. However, we need a comprehensive, expert consensus document outlining critical concepts, including identifying necessary personnel and expertise, criteria for patient selection, and a standardized approach to preprocedural planning and establishing criteria for evaluating procedural efficacy and safety. Given this lack of standards, the balloon pulmonary angioplasty skill set is learned through peer-to-peer contact and training. This document is a state-of-the-art, comprehensive statement from key thought leaders to address this gap in the current clinical practice of balloon pulmonary angioplasty. We summarize the current status of the procedure and provide a consensus opinion on the role of balloon pulmonary angioplasty in the overall care of patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary disease with and without pulmonary hypertension. We also identify knowledge gaps, provide guidance for new centers interested in initiating balloon pulmonary angioplasty programs, and highlight future directions and research needs for this emerging therapy.

Attainment of LDL-Cholesterol Goals in Patients with Previous Myocardial Infarction: A Real-World Cross-Sectional Analysis.

The European Society of Cardiology guidelines recommend an LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) < 55 mg/dL for patients with established cardiovascular disease. While the Friedewald equation to estimate LDL-C is still widely used, the newer Martin-Hopkins equation has shown greater accuracy. We aimed to assess: A) the proportion of patients reaching LDL-C goal and the therapies used in a tertiary center; B) the impact of using the Martin-Hopkins method instead of Friedewald's on the proportion of controlled patients. A single-center cross-sectional study including consecutive post-myocardial infarction patients followed by 20 cardiologists in a tertiary hospital. Data was collected retrospectively from clinical appointments that took place after April 2022. For each patient, the LDL-C levels and attainment of goals were estimated from an ambulatory lipid profile using both Friedewald and Martin-Hopkins equations. A two-tailed p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant for all tests. Overall, 400 patients were included (aged 67 ± 13 years, 77% male). Using Friedewald's equation, the median LDL-C under therapy was 64 (50-81) mg/dL, and 31% had LDL-C within goals. High-intensity statins were used in 64% of patients, 37% were on ezetimibe, and 0.5% were under PCSK9 inhibitors. Combination therapy of high-intensity statin + ezetimibe was used in 102 patients (26%). Applying the Martin-Hopkins method would reclassify a total of 31 patients (7.8%). Among those deemed controlled by Friedewald's equation, 27 (21.6%) would have a Martin-Hopkins' LDL-C above goals. Less than one-third of post-myocardial infarction patients had LDL-C within the goal. Applying the Martin-Hopkins equation would reclassify one-fifth of presumably controlled patients into the non-controlled group.

Thyroid Dysfunction in Advanced Heart Failure Patients and Its Correlation with Amiodarone Therapy: A Two-Year Study.

(1) Background: Advanced heart failure often accompanies ventricular arrhythmias, necessitating antiarrhythmic therapies. Amiodarone, commonly used for this purpose, may induce thyroid dysfunction due to its high iodine content. However, the prevalence and correlation of thyroid dysfunction with amiodarone in end-stage heart failure patients remain unclear. Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence and types of thyroid dysfunction and their association with amiodarone among 200 patients diagnosed with advanced heart failure eligible for transplantation. (2) Methods: Consecutively enrolled patients received treatment following the European Society of Cardiology guidelines and were followed-up for two years. Ventricular arrhythmias affected 58.5% of the cohort, with 24.5% receiving amiodarone therapy. (3) Results: Thyroid metabolism dysfunction was evident in 61 patients, notably overrepresented in women (p = 0.0028). Hyperthyroidism (34 patients) and hypothyroidism (27 patients) were observed, with a significant amiodarone-related correlation. Despite this, thyroid dysfunction was not associated with increased mortality among the studied group. (4) Conclusions: Thyroid dysfunction is prevalent in advanced heart failure patients, with a notable proportion linked to amiodarone. However, its presence does not correspond to higher mortality rates. Understanding these associations is crucial for effective management in this patient population. Further exploration is warranted to refine approaches to thyroid dysfunction in refractory heart failure.

Clinical characteristics and long-term outcomes of patients with heart failure with improved ejection fraction. First Polish experience from LECRA-HF registry

PurposeHeart failure (HF) with improved ejection fraction (HFimpEF) is a new category of HF introduced in the newest European Society of Cardiology guidelines. However, clinical characteristics and long-term outcomes of HFimpEF patients remain insufficiently elucidated. We sought to characterize Polish HFimpEF patients and determine their long-term mortality. Material and methodsOf 1186 patients enrolled in the single-center Lesser Poland Cracovian Heart Failure (LECRA-HF) registry between 2009 and 2019 and hospitalized due to HF decompensation, 340 (28.7%) were those with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Based on follow-up echocardiography, 61 (17.9%) of them were classified as HFimpEF and the remaining as HFnon-impEF. ResultsHFimpEF patients were more frequently females (P ​< ​0.001), had higher baseline left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF, P ​< ​0.001), had less often a history of diabetes (P ​= ​0.024), severe chronic kidney disease (P ​= ​0.026) or prior myocardial infarction (P ​= ​0.008) than HFnon-impEF patients. By multivariable analysis the HFimpEF diagnosis was independently predicted by baseline NYHA I/II (odds ratio [OR] 2.347, 95% confidence interval [95%CI] 1.020–5.405), non-ischemic etiology (OR 3.096, 95%CI 1.587–6.024), lack of diabetes mellitus (OR 2.016, 95%CI 1.059–3.846) and higher baseline LVEF (OR 1.084, 95%CI 1.042–1.126, per 1%). Within the median 49 (25–77) months all-cause mortality was lower in HFimpEF than in HFnon-impEF (10.8 vs 16.4%/year, P ​= ​0.004). ConclusionsOur findings indicate that every sixth Polish patient with HFrEF has a chance to improve LVEF during follow-up and to become a HFimpEF patient. Baseline characteristics of HFimpEF patients are different from HFnon-impEF. Simultaneously, the HFimpEF diagnosis is associated with higher long-term survival.

Diabetes mellitus does not alter mortality or hospitalisation risk in patients with newly diagnosed heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: Time to rethink pathophysiological models of disease progression.

Type 2 diabetes is a common and adverse prognostic co-morbidity for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). The effect of diabetes on long-term outcomes for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is less established. Prospective cohort study of patients referred to a regional HF clinic with newly diagnosed with HFrEF and HFpEF according to the 2016 European Society of Cardiology guidelines. The association between diabetes, all-cause mortality and hospitalisation was quantified using Kaplan-Meier or Cox regression analysis. Between 1st May 2012 and 1st May 2013, of 960 unselected consecutive patients referred with suspected HF, 464 and 314 patients met the criteria for HFpEF and HFrEF respectively. Within HFpEF and HFrEF groups, patients with diabetes were more frequently male and in both groups patients with diabetes were more likely to be treated with β-adrenoceptor antagonists and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors. After adjustment for age, sex, medical therapy and co-morbidities, diabetes was associated with increased mortality in individuals with HFrEF (HR 1.46 95% CI: 1.05-2.02; p = .023), but not in those with HFpEF (HR 1.26 95% CI 0.92-1.72; p = .146). In unselected patients with newly diagnosed HF, diabetes is not an adverse prognostic marker in patients with HFpEF, but is in HFrEF.

Direct oral anticoagulant: Looking beyond convenience

Since the 2010 Food and Drug Administration approval of Dabigatran as the first non-vitamin-K antagonist oral anticoagulants or direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) as it is now more commonly referred to, there has been much development in the field with increasing availability of different DOACs and an expansion in indications of use. In the prevention of thromboembolism in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), DOACs have overtaken warfarin, which has been first-line therapy since the 1950s. In the most recent 2023 guidelines by the American Heart Association (AHA) for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation, there is a Class 1A recommendation for patients who are candidates for anticoagulation without mechanical heart valve or history of moderate-to-severe rheumatic mitral stenosis to be prescribed DOACs over warfarin to reduce the risk of mortality, stroke, systemic embolism and intracranial haemorrhage.1 This stance is also echoed by the European Society of Cardiology guidelines in 2020,2 and—closer to home—in the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society 2017 Consensus.3

Getting to the heart of the matter—are two agents really better than one for the treatment of staphylococcal infective endocarditis?

The recently published European Society of Cardiology guidelines for infective endocarditis management recommends daptomycin combination therapy for the treatment of staphylococcal endocarditis in severe penicillin allergy, rather than daptomycin monotherapy. We discuss the evidence base behind this recommendation, highlighting concerns regarding the lack of robust clinical studies, increased cost and logistical considerations, and adverse effects of combination therapy. Although further studies are required to elucidate the role of combination vs monotherapy in these patients, we propose a pragmatic management approach to reduce the risk of adverse antimicrobial side effects and limit costs, while aiming to maintain treatment efficacy.

To What Extent Does Cardiovascular Risk Classification of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Differ between European Guidelines from 2023, 2021, and 2019? A Cross-Sectional Study.

Background and Objectives: Type 2 Diabetes (T2DM) is intricately associated with an increased cardiovascular (CV) risk, highlighting the imperative for tailored intervention in the prevention and management of CV diseases. To assess the CV risk and subsequent interventions in patients with diabetes, the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) has been consistently developing and updating specific guidelines for risk assessment and patient management since 2019. The 2023 risk classification method has significantly changed, introducing a novel probability-based assessment through the implementation of SCORE2-Diabetes instrument. This marks a shift from the risk factor-based classification employed in the 2019 and 2021 methods, representing an innovative approach in risk assessment for individuals with T2DM. This study aims to evaluate the differences in the CV risk classification among hospitalized patients with T2DM using the three proposed methods within the Romanian population, a European population considered to be at very high cardiovascular risk. Materials and Methods: in a consecutive-case, population-based study design, 70 patients hospitalized with T2DM from a European population characterized by very high CV risk were assessed for CV risk using the three proposed methods. The differences between these classifications were subsequently analyzed. Results: In the study group, according to 2023 classification, one patient (1.4%) was classified with moderate CV risk, eight (11.4%) with high cardiovascular risk, and sixty-one (87.2%) with very high cardiovascular risk. A total of 36 patients (51.4%) were classified differently compared to 2021 criteria, the differences being statistically significant (p = 0.047), while 13 (18.6%) were different compared to 2019 criteria, the differences being statistically non-significant (p = 0.731). By comparing the 2021 to the 2019 ESC Guidelines recommendations, 40 patients had a one-step decrease in cardiovascular risk category, from very high to high risk. Conclusions: Most patients included in the analysis were classified as very high CV risk (87.2%). Within a European population characterized by very high CV risk, the SCORE2-Diabetes instrument proves to be a valuable tool, contributing to most step-ups in CV risk classes within the 2023 classification. In a very-high-risk demographic, the 2023 algorithm resulted in different classifications in contrast to the 2021 method but similar classifications observed with the 2019 method.

Is ChatGPT knowledgeable of acute coronary syndromes and pertinent European Society of Cardiology Guidelines?

Advancements in artificial intelligence are being seen in multiple fields, including medicine, and this trend is likely to continue going forward. To analyze the accuracy and reproducibility of ChatGPT answers about acute coronary syndromes (ACS). The questions asked to ChatGPT were prepared in two categories. A list of frequently asked questions (FAQs) created from inquiries asked by the public and while preparing the scientific question list, 2023 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Guidelines for the management of ACS and ESC Clinical Practice Guidelines were used. Accuracy and reproducibility of ChatGPT responses about ACS were evaluated by two cardiologists with ten years of experience using Global Quality Score (GQS). Eventually, 72 FAQs related to ACS met the study inclusion criteria. In total, 65 (90.3%) ChatGPT answers scored GQS 5, which indicated highest accuracy and proficiency. None of the ChatGPT responses to FAQs about ACS scored GQS 1. In addition, highest accuracy and reliability of ChatGPT answers was obtained for the prevention and lifestyle section with GQS 5 for 19 (95%) answers, and GQS 4 for 1 (5%) answer. In contrast, accuracy and proficiency of ChatGPT answers were lowest for the treatment and management section. Moreover, 68 (88.3%) ChatGPT responses for guideline based questions scored GQS 5. Reproducibility of ChatGPT answers was 94.4% for FAQs and 90.9% for ESC guidelines questions. This study shows for the first time that ChatGPT can give accurate and sufficient responses to more than 90% of FAQs about ACS. In addition, proficiency and correctness of ChatGPT answers about questions depending on ESC guidelines was also substantial.

Cardiovascular risk assessment in Portugal's primary health care system: SCORE vs. SCORE2

Introduction and objectivesThe 2021 European Society of Cardiology guidelines on cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention introduced the more accurate SCORE2 risk model as a replacement for the earlier SCORE, which is still used in primary care software in Portugal. Our objective is to determine whether the difference between risk assessment using SCORE and SCORE2, in the same patient population, is statistically significant. MethodsA total of 1642 patients aged 40–65 without previous CVD, from the medical records of two Family Health Units, were included in this cross-sectional study. SCORE and SCORE2 were calculated using the variables gender, age, smoking status, lipid profile and systolic blood pressure. A statistical analysis was performed on the results. ResultsUsing SCORE, 98% of the patients were in the low–moderate risk categories and 2% in the high or very high risk categories. When using SCORE2, the corresponding percentages were 55% and 45%, respectively. Reclassification with SCORE2 into higher categories was more often observed in younger (under 50 years of age) and male patients. With SCORE, 38.61% of patients were within the LDL-C target range; this figure fell to 20.28% with SCORE2. These differences are statistically significant (p<0.0001). ConclusionOur findings show that a significant number of patients in this cohort who were classified through SCORE at lower risk levels were reclassified into higher risk categories with SCORE2. Similarly, the number of patients within the LDL-C target range for LDL-C was also lower using SCORE2.

Explainable machine learning using echocardiography to improve risk prediction in patients with chronic coronary syndrome.

The European Society of Cardiology guidelines recommend risk stratification with limited clinical parameters such as left ventricular (LV) function in patients with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS). Machine learning (ML) methods enable an analysis of complex datasets including transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) studies. We aimed to evaluate the accuracy of ML using clinical and TTE data to predict all-cause 5-year mortality in patients with CCS and to compare its performance with traditional risk stratification scores. Data of consecutive patients with CCS were retrospectively collected if they attended the outpatient clinic of Amsterdam UMC location AMC between 2015 and 2017 and had a TTE assessment of the LV function. An eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) model was trained to predict all-cause 5-year mortality. The performance of this ML model was evaluated using data from the Amsterdam UMC location VUmc and compared with the reference standard of traditional risk scores. A total of 1253 patients (775 training set and 478 testing set) were included, of which 176 patients (105 training set and 71 testing set) died during the 5-year follow-up period. The ML model demonstrated a superior performance [area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) 0.79] compared with traditional risk stratification tools (AUC 0.62-0.76) and showed good external performance. The most important TTE risk predictors included in the ML model were LV dysfunction and significant tricuspid regurgitation. This study demonstrates that an explainable ML model using TTE and clinical data can accurately identify high-risk CCS patients, with a prognostic value superior to traditional risk scores.

Role of routine investigations post cardiac devices implants in detecting peri-procedural complications: A retrospective analysis from a tertiary UK center.

Peri-procedural complications associated with cardiac implantable electronic devices are not uncommon. European Society of Cardiology guidelines recommend device checks of all devices within 72h of implant. European Heart Rhythm Association expert practical guide on Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) recommend that a chest x-ray (CXR) should be performed within 24h to rule out pneumothorax and document lead positions. First, the rate of peri-procedural complications associated with CIED implants at our center, as well as patient and/or procedural-related factors that are associated with higher rates of complications, is analyzed. Second, the yield of the guideline-recommended measures in the early detection of peri-procedural complications is examined. Consecutive de novo transvenous device implants at our center in 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients' demographics, types and indications for device therapy, procedural reports, device checks, and CXRs were obtained from the hospital electronic records. A total of 578 patients (Age 74±16 years, 68% male) were included. All patients had routine post-procedure CXRs and device checks. There were 16 (2.8%) complications; 7 (1.2%) pneumothoraxes, 6 (1%) pericardial effusions, and 3 (0.5%) lead displacements. Procedure time correlated significantly with complications; in uncomplicated cases it was 99±43 min versus 127±50 min in procedures associated with complications (p=.02). Routine post CIED implantation CXRs can detect early peri-procedural complications, while repeat post mobilization device checks has low yield of detection of complications. The only statistically significant predictor of peri-procedural complications is the duration of the procedure; longer procedures were associated with higher rates of complications.

Antithrombotic therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome: similarities and differences between a European expert consensus document and the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines.

Antithrombotic therapy represents the cornerstone of the pharmacological treatment in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The optimal combination and duration of antithrombotic therapy is still matter of debate requiring a critical assessment of patient comorbidities, clinical presentation, revascularization modality, and/or optimization of medical treatment. The 2023 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines for the management of patients with ACS encompassing both patients with and without ST segment elevation ACS have been recently published. Shortly before, a European expert consensus task force produced guidance for clinicians on the management of antithrombotic therapy in patients with ACS as well as chronic coronary syndrome. The scope of this manuscript is to provide a critical appraisal of differences and similarities between the European consensus paper and the latest ESC recommendations on oral antithrombotic regimens in ACS patients.

2023 Focused Update of the 2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: Developed by the task force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) With the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC.

Document Reviewers: Rudolf A. de Boer (CPG Review Co-ordinator) (Netherlands), P. Christian Schulze (CPG Review Co-ordinator) (Germany), Elena Arbelo (Spain), Jozef Bartunek (Belgium), Johann Bauersachs (Germany), Michael A. Borger (Germany), Sergio Buccheri (Sweden), Elisabetta Cerbai (Italy), Erwan Donal (France), Frank Edelmann (Germany), Gloria Färber (Germany), Bettina Heidecker (Germany), Borja Ibanez (Spain), Stefan James (Sweden), Lars Køber (Denmark), Konstantinos C. Koskinas (Switzerland), Josep Masip (Spain), John William McEvoy (Ireland), Robert Mentz (United States of America), Borislava Mihaylova (United Kingdom), Jacob Eifer Møller (Denmark), Wilfried Mullens (Belgium), Lis Neubeck (United Kingdom), Jens Cosedis Nielsen (Denmark), Agnes A. Pasquet (Belgium), Piotr Ponikowski (Poland), Eva Prescott (Denmark), Amina Rakisheva (Kazakhstan), Bianca Rocca (Italy), Xavier Rossello (Spain), Leyla Elif Sade (United States of America/Türkiye), Hannah Schaubroeck (Belgium), Elena Tessitore (Switzerland), Mariya Tokmakova (Bulgaria), Peter van der Meer (Netherlands), Isabelle C. Van Gelder (Netherlands), Mattias Van Heetvelde (Belgium), Christiaan Vrints (Belgium), Matthias Wilhelm (Switzerland), Adam Witkowski (Poland), and Katja Zeppenfeld (Netherlands) All experts involved in the development of this Focused Update have submitted declarations of interest. These have been compiled in a report and simultaneously published in a supplementary document to the Focused Update. The report is also available on the ESC website www.escardio.org/guidelines See the European Heart Journal online for supplementary documents that include evidence tables.